We have now posted on our kickback story of the LovelandPolitics news website the following documents:
1. The City of Loveland “Minimum Requirements” sent to bidders on the ACE project
2. The City of Loveland Request For Proposal sent to potential bidders
3. Two letters from the City of Loveland rejecting two bidders
The documents are now available for the public to examine on our webpage so we invite you to explore each and provide us your own independent analysis or opinion.
The minimum requirements document states,
“The property is proposed to be transferred to CAMT (or its designated affiliated entity), for the ACE Project without any direct expense to CAMT. The ACE Project will involve the City of Loveland, CAMT or its affiliated entity, and a private developer. The Business Terms outline the roles of each of the parties. The relationship is designed to provide a continuing cash flow income to CAMT from the ACE Campus property; to motivate each of the parties to collaborate in the success of the project; to maximize benefits; and to provide a reasonable return on developer investment.”
If CAMT is not contributing financially to the project and NASA’s agreement clearly states they are not contributing financially to ACE it leaves only the City of Loveland to fund the project with whatever the private developer is willing to also invest. It certainly appears as though the City of Loveland should be conducting an exhaustive due diligence effort into this opportunity.
One correction we should make is that we misunderstood the purpose of what some on council and staff reported to us was the “McWhinney” clause. The McWhinney clause is in the conflict of interest section of the RFP and states:
“Developers who are associated with proposals of other “Existing Building” sites being considered for the ACE Project are deemed to have a conflict of interest, and will not be able to propose for this project. Proposers are required to certify that they are not associated with other proposals for Existing Buildings. Developers who are associated with “Greenfield Sites” being proposed for ACE, however, may propose for this project.”
Curiously, the city failed to provide any common conflict of interest language prohibiting bids from anyone colluding with those involved in the source selection process (CAMT for instance) which we believe would have likely disqualified Don Marostica’s Loveland Commercial.
We learned the Mayor of another city marketed by CAMT decided not to bid for the following reason; he reports showing a property to a CAMT representative but was concerned CAMT wanted the city to pay for everything and the city would get nothing more than a maybe that CAMT can help bring jobs. We heard second hand the mayor said it wasn’t a good deal for his city or any municipality for that matter when asked.
There are some on Loveland’s council and city staff who believe the ACE/CAMT project is Loveland’s best opportunity to develop a property the city otherwise may have to redevelop anyway with city monies to maintain the same type of use. Otherwise, they argue, the community may not like what a private buyer of the property ultimately decides to do with it. Either way, we believe the city’s process should be transparent, informed and absent the misleading comments about NASA choosing to bring thousands of jobs to Loveland. In fact, it is Loveland taxpayers who are being asked to fill CAMT’s rice bowl simply for choosing Loveland regardless of whether or not they actually bring jobs to the city. If CAMT were more confident in the credibity of their own projections about ACE bringing 7,000 to 10,000 jobs to Loveland than a results oriented compensation agreement with the developer shouldn’t be an issue.
May 31, Update -
Tune into KFKA of Greeley (1310 AM dial) radio to hear the Amy Oliver Show discuss LovelandPolitics and the proposed deal for Loveland to subsidize the redevelopment of the Agilent Campus this morning beginning at 9:00 AM.