Archive for December, 2009

Four Enter Race For Ward 1

Monday, December 21st, 2009

Loveland special election begins in earnest today as four candidates have returned their petitions and been certified by the city clerk to be placed on the special mail-in ballot.

Read the in-depth LovelandPolitics story on the candidates (Donna Rice, Rob Molloy, Adam Koniecki and John Case) by clicking here.

We strongly disagree with former councilman and failed mayoral candidate David Clark’s tactic of trying to pressure people out of the race to artificially limit the number of choices Loveland voters will have in the election. These tactics need to be denounced in Loveland and candidates who endorse them called out into the open.

All four of the candidates appear qualified and interested in the seat. Please take a minute to read the story and post your comments here.

Thanks

Johnson’s Morning After Email – Klen vs. City of Loveland

Sunday, December 20th, 2009

Loveland’s city hall was buzzing last week in reaction to an email sent out by Councilwoman Johnson that appears to be;

1. A violation of Colorado’s open meetings law
2. An unauthorized disclosure of a closed session meeting discussion
3. A waiver of the city’s right to Tuesday’s privileged attorney-client communication thus opening the door for the plaintiffs to review any tape recording of the meeting

Johnson, an attorney by training, is trying to lawyer the city’s defense in Klen vs. the City of Loveland by herself and all while frustrating the efforts of the outside counsel, John Duval (City Attorney) and Don Williams. We do agree, however, with Johnson’s conclusions.

The city should settle the case now to cut their losses and REMOVE staff responsible for any illegal conduct that may have occurred resulting in the costly litigation.

City Manager Don Williams has been promoting a tactic of running the plaintiffs out of money by filing lots of summary motions while also allegedly blacklisting the developers from doing any business in Loveland even on property they already own.

Unfortunately, the high cost of William’s strategy means now over $200,000 has been spent by Loveland tax payers on this case that hasn’t even gone to trial yet. So we agree with Johnson’s conclusions to settle the case but certainly not her blunders in trying to find support from her colleagues to do it over a public email system.

As a Loveland taxpayer, you are paying for William’s expensive defense team strategy but will also pay any damages if the city goes to trial. What are your thoughts?

Council Retreat Shows Lack of Common Sense

Tuesday, December 15th, 2009

Last year, city tax dollars paid some $900 for Loveland Councilmembers and their spouses to attend a “Candlelight Dinner Show,” $4,800 for a facilitator named Rob Tipton to work 1 ½ days and $1,200 for catering during the Saturday retreat held in meeting rooms at Group Publishing in Loveland.

Loveland staff have proposed the same agenda this year for early January with the following expenses:

Candlelight Dinner – $900
Facilitator (1.5 days) $4,800
Catering $1,200

Expensive council eating habits has its roots in a letter dated January 28, 2008 by a planning committee for the council’s 2008 retreat. Carol Johnson, according to the letter to her colleagues, determined in consultation with other committee members that “no more rubber chicken” would be tolerated for council members to eat during future retreats. This is ironic because it was Carol Johnson who recently protested to her newer colleagues during a public council meeting that she thought a dinner and show wasn’t really a necessary expense this year for their annual retreat. We agree.

Last year’s $900 meal at the Candlelight Dinner Theater near Johnson’s Corner was unanimously approved. Former Councilman David Clark arranged the pricey dinner including meals and drinks at the restaurant using Loveland taxpayer dollars. Clark argued that as a part owner in the business he was getting the city a better deal than they paid at the Bent Fork in 2008 for just a dinner but no live show. We wonder how anyone can argue that a dinner theater event involves city business and must be paid from city tax dollars when so many Loveland resident are struggling financially.

According to one city employee, the following issues were not given enough thought or consideration by staff before proposing the budget for this year’s council retreat.

1. Rushing the retreat to early January means no representative from Ward 1 may attend. A special election to fill the Ward 1 council seat occurs in early March. Given the current composition of Loveland’s council, it is likely a number of decisions on how to direct staff will end in tied 4 to 4 votes. Without the 9th member the meeting could be useless.

2. Retreats managed by a facilitator are normally held to IMPROVE bad or tired working relationship where there are difficulties within the group. Loveland’s new council has only just met and are still on their honeymoon. As one observer commented, “it is like inviting a marriage counselor to your honeymoon.”

3. Residents of Loveland are being asked to do with less services as the city cuts services in an effort to balance its budget. We don’t believe most Lovleand residents see the retreat as a necessary governmental expense.

The retreat needs to be postponed until the entire council for 2010 is present and seated.

Larimer County Commissioner Rennels Resigns

Tuesday, December 15th, 2009

Kathay Rennels announced today she is resigning from the Larimer County Board of Commissioners on Dec 31. She has accepted a full-time position to become the Director of Economic Development at CSU. The Larimer County Republican Party Central Committee will have 10 days to name her replacement.

Names rumored as possible replacements include Larimer County Sheriff Jim Alderden, Eric Kronwall, and John Clarke.

Larimer County Commissioners represent specific areas of the county where they must also live. Therefore any candidate for the appointment will need to be a resident of the northern part of Larimer County.

Any comments or suggestions of potential candidates?

Is Red Concrete a New Public Art for Loveland?

Sunday, December 6th, 2009

We applaud the Loveland Daily Reporter-Herald Editorial bringing-up the issue of increasingly ugly medians in Loveland. The removal of the last median trees on Wilson was celebrated with signs along Wilson Ave. bragging about the public improvement. see story on concrete red medians

Please post any comments to the story here.

McWhinney Flaunts Campaign Finance Reform

Sunday, December 6th, 2009

Like an old dog that can’t learn new tricks, McWhinney appears to be back to their old games of trying to influence Loveland politics through clandestine political contributions.

Ault resident and Vice President and General Manager of McWhineny, Jay Hardy, appears to have coordinated multiple contributions to three pro-McWhinney candidates too late for the contributions to be reported before the election was over. see LovelandPolitics story

The only problem with this sinister campaign tactic is it ignored Loveland’s newly amended City Charter that reflects the new contribution limits of $100 placed on everyone. The revelations back in 2006 that Gene Pielin and Larry Walsh (first reported by LovelandPolitics) had their campaigns bank rolled by multiple McWhinney entities was the catalyst for the reform.

Simply put, any individual cannot direct multiple contributions to the same candidate if that individual’s contribution (either in-kind or cash) will exceed $100. McWhinney and Hardy apparently provided at least $500 dollars to three candidates while the fourth candidate, Bob Snyder, is said to have refused the offer on ethical and legal grounds.

The question is whether the new council has the political courage to initiate a city inquiry into the question of whether the law was indeed broken and assess the appropriate penalties if any violators are identified.

I guess McWhinney has available as a potential defense that the multiple company contributors all using McWhinney’s addresses coincidentally donated to these candidates on the same day and that McWhinney has no ownership or control over any of those companies. Hmmm…..would you buy that?